Key result
Mixed circadian ventricular tachyarrhythmia pattern is linked to ~4.4-fold higher risk of cardiac death.
Why the study?
The prognostic significance of individual ventricular tachyarrhythmia onset circadian patterns recorded via home monitoring in high-risk sudden cardiac death patients remains poorly defined.
Does a mixed circadian pattern of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) predict increased mortality in patients with high-risk SCD receiving ICDs or CRT-Ds?
Cohort (n=756)
Yes
Does a mixed circadian pattern of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) predict increased mortality in patients with high-risk SCD receiving ICDs or CRT-Ds?
A mixed circadian pattern of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (absence of a dominant diurnal rhythm) serves as a strong digital phenotype independently predicting higher risks of cardiac death and all-cause mortality in high-risk SCD patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed VTA circadian pattern signals elevated cardiac death risk in device patients; hypothesis-generating for refined stratification, needs prospective validation.
Background While ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) exhibited circadian variation at the population level, the prognostic significance of individual VTA onset circadian patterns recorded via home monitoring in patients with high-risk SCD remains poorly defined. Methods This secondary analysis of the SUMMIT registry retrospectively evaluated archived remote monitoring data. Patients were categorized into four groups based on the diurnal distribution of their VTA episodes: no VTA, daytime VTA (> 70% of episodes between 06: 00-21: 59), nocturnal VTA (> 70% between 22: 00-05: 59), and mixed VTA (no predominant pattern). Results Among 756 included patients (mean follow-up 48.8 months), 443 (58.6%) experienced at least one VTA. Dominant daytime VTA onset occurred in 292 patients (65.9%), dominant nocturnal onset in 57 (12.9%), and mixed diurnal pattern in 94 (21.2%). The mixed VTA group had the highest mortality risks across four VTA groups, which demonstrated 4.4- and 2.5-fold higher risks of cardiac death (hazard ratio (HR): 4.42; 95% CI: 2.52–7.76; P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.69–3.73; P < 0.001) when compared to the no-VTA group, respectively. This association persisted even after excluding patients with electrical storms, with the mixed VTA group remaining an independent predictor of both cardiac death (adjusted HR: 2.61; P = 0.017) and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 2.27; P = 0.002). Conclusions A mixed VTA circadian pattern, characterized by the absence of a dominant diurnal rhythm, is a strong, independent predictor of increased mortality in high-risk SCD patients, highlighting its value for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in High-risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) with ICD or CRT-D (n=756). Mixed ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) circadian pattern vs. No VTA was evaluated on Cardiac death (HR 4.42, 95% CI 2.52-7.76, p=< 0.001). A mixed ventricular tachyarrhythmia circadian pattern, characterized by the absence of a dominant diurnal rhythm, independently predicted a 4.4-fold higher risk of cardiac death (HR 4.42).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: