Key result
Mild academic anxiety linked to ~12-point higher breathing pattern irregularity scores in students.
Why the study?
Stress and anxiety may alter normal breathing patterns, but breathing pattern irregularities during academic stress in students with mild anxiety were not well characterized.
Observational (n=21)
College students experiencing mild academic anxiety demonstrate measurable breathing pattern irregularities, highlighting the potential value of objective breathing assessments and retraining strategies.
Breathing irregularities were associated with mild academic anxiety in students; hypothesis-generating for objective assessments, does not support practice change.
Background: Breathing is an essential physiological process influenced by the respiratory and autonomic nervous systems. Stress and anxiety may alter normal breathing through rapid, shallow, or irregular respiration. Academic pressure is a common stressor among college students and may contribute to mild anxiety and breathing pattern changes. Objective: To observe breathing pattern irregularities in students with mild self-reported anxiety during periods of academic stress. Methods: An observational, single-time-point study screened 30 college students. Participants were screened using an STAI-based self-reported anxiety questionnaire. Twenty-one students who screened positive for mild self-reported anxiety completed the BPI assessment and formed the analytic sample, which comprised participants aged 17–23 years. Descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk testing, a one-sample t-test against the scale midpoint of 40, and age–BPI correlation analysis were used. Results: Among the 21 students with positive screening results for mild anxiety, the mean BPI score was 52.24 ± 6.04/80 (median 49; IQR 48–58; range 46–67). BPI severity was classified as mild in 12 students (57.1%), moderate in 7 (33.3%), and severe in 2 (9.5%). Scores were non-normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk W = 0.834, p = 0.002), while the mean BPI score was significantly higher than the theoretical midpoint of 40 (t(20) = 9.284, p < 0.001). Age was not significantly correlated with BPI score (r = 0.033, p = 0.887). Conclusion: The study demonstrated measurable breathing pattern irregularities among students with mild self-reported anxiety during academic stress. The presence of moderate and severe BPI scores despite mild self-reported anxiety highlights the value of objective breathing assessment and supports preventive physiotherapy approaches such as breathing retraining and stress-management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaduvanshi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Mild self-reported anxiety during academic stress (n=21). Mild self-reported anxiety during academic stress vs. Theoretical scale midpoint of 40 was evaluated on Breathing Pattern Irregularities (BPI) score (p=<0.001). Students with mild self-reported anxiety during academic stress exhibited a mean BPI score of 52.24, which was significantly higher than the theoretical midpoint of 40 (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: