Key result
Increasing multidimensional health vulnerability is linked to ~2.1-fold higher incident CVD risk.
Why the study?
Existing health vulnerability assessments lack integration of multidimensional domains and consideration of temporal dynamic changes in relation to cardiovascular disease risk.
Do dynamic changes and persistently elevated multidimensional health vulnerability increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in adults?
Cohort (n=16,072)
Yes
Do dynamic changes and persistently elevated multidimensional health vulnerability increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in adults?
Hazard Ratio: 2.14 (95% CI 1.74–2.63)
p-value: p=<0.001
Dynamic increases or persistently elevated multidimensional health vulnerability are independently associated with an increased risk of future cardiovascular events, underscoring the value of longitudinal vulnerability assessment in CVD risk stratification.
Dynamic vulnerability increases may flag higher CVD risk; leaves open whether targeting trajectories reduces events.
Background: Health vulnerability (HV), an intrinsic multidimensional construct integrating physiological, psychological, and social domains, may be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, existing HV assessments lack integration and temporal dynamics change. This study identifies the dynamic association between the HV and risk of CVD. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study included 16,072 participants from the UK Biobank with HV assessments at baseline (2006-2010) and repeat assessment (2014). Latent class analysis and latent transition analysis were used to identify HV transition patterns. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to evaluate associations between HV transitions and incident CVD, with follow-up initiated from baseline assessment. Sensitivity analyses included alternative HV transitions classification, exclusion of hypertensive diseases from the composite outcome, and competing risk analyses considering non-CVD death. Results: During a median follow-up of 8.9 years, 3,033 incident CVD events were identified. Compared with persistently low vulnerability, increasing vulnerability and persistently elevated vulnerability were associated with higher CVD risk after multivariable adjustment (HR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.74-2.63 and HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08-1.29, respectively). Subgroup analyses identified significant effect modification by age and smoking status, indicating that the associations between HV transitions and CVD risk differed across these populations. The main findings remained consistent in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Dynamic changes in HV were associated with subsequent CVD risk, with increasing and persistently elevated vulnerability showing higher risks. These findings highlight the potential importance of monitoring multidimensional vulnerability changes for cardiovascular risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=16,072). Increasing multidimensional health vulnerability vs. Persistently low vulnerability was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.74-2.63, p=<0.001). Increasing multidimensional health vulnerability was associated with a significantly higher risk of incident cardiovascular disease compared to persistently low vulnerability (HR 2.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: