Key result
Refined AI-ECG improves LVSD detection over prior model in pregnant patients to AUROC ~0.93.
Why the study?
Artificial intelligence-enabled ECG models have shown effectiveness in detecting LVSD in adults and limited obstetric cohorts, but broad validation in diverse obstetric populations remains unexplored.
Does an AI-ECG model accurately detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction in pregnant or postpartum women?
Observational (n=1,820)
Yes
Does an AI-ECG model accurately detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction in pregnant or postpartum women?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.925 vs 0.865
p-value: p=<0.001
Refined AI-ECG models demonstrated strong external validity and high accuracy for detecting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a diverse, global obstetric cohort, suggesting their potential as a scalable screening tool.
Supports AI-ECG evaluation for LVSD detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Cardiomyopathy significantly impacts maternal health worldwide. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) have shown effectiveness in detecting left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in adults and limited obstetric cohorts; however, broad validation in diverse obstetric populations remains unexplored. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to validate the performance of 2 versions of an AI-ECG model for detecting cardiomyopathy in an international obstetric cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multisite study of pregnant or postpartum women (≤12 months) across 11 institutions in 4 countries (Israel, Nigeria, Pakistan, and the United States). Two AI-ECG models (Food and Drug Administration-cleared v2.5.0 and refined v3.0.0) were evaluated against echocardiography. LVSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% in keeping with the model's training target. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: We included 1,820 women with paired ECG-echocardiogram data, of whom 7.3% had LVSD. Model 1 (v2.5.0) demonstrated strong discriminative performance with an AUROC of 0.865, sensitivity of 46.1%, and negative predictive value of 95.8%. Model 2 (v3.0.0) showed significantly improved performance, with an AUROC of 0.925, sensitivity of 64.1%, and negative predictive value of 97.2% (P < 0.001) for LVSD detection. CONCLUSIONS: AI-ECG models demonstrated strong external validity in a global obstetric cohort, with significantly improved performance in the refined model trained on expanded data. These findings support the potential role of AI-ECG for a scalable LVSD screening tool in obstetric populations, while underscoring the importance of population-specific validation prior to clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adedinsewo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiomyopathy (n=1,820). AI-ECG model v3.0.0 vs. AI-ECG model v2.5.0 was evaluated on Detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) defined as left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (AUROC 0.925 vs 0.865, p=<0.001). The refined AI-ECG model (v3.0.0) significantly improved detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in an international obstetric cohort compared to v2.5.0 (AUROC 0.925 vs 0.865; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: