Key result
ECG demonstrates ~79% diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease compared to coronary angiography.
Why the study?
The diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiography for coronary artery disease using coronary angiography as the gold standard was evaluated to determine its reliability.
Does electrocardiography accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to coronary angiography in patients presenting with chest pain?
Cross-Sectional (n=160)
No
Does electrocardiography accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to coronary angiography in patients presenting with chest pain?
A standard 12-lead ECG provides high sensitivity and moderate diagnostic accuracy for predicting significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients undergoing angiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ECG may support initial CAD evaluation in referred patients; leaves open validation as a gatekeeper before angiography in broader populations.
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease taking coronary angiography as gold standard Methodology: This Cross-sectional, validation research was conducted in the department of Cardiology, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore from August 2025 to January 2026. After obtaining informed consent and demographics, patients underwent ECG and findings were recorded. Cases were labeled as positive or negative for coronary artery disease if ECG was abnormal or normal, respectively. All patients then underwent coronary angiography. On coronary angiography, if >50% stenosis was present in one or more coronary artery, then it was confirmed as positive coronary artery disease. Data was noted in proforma and analyzed in SPSS v27. Results: Mean age of enrolled cases 51.13 ± 11.84 years. There were 88 (55%) men and 72 (45%) women in whole sample. On angiography, there were 82 (51.25%) positive patients for CAD while 78 (48.75%) were negative. On coronary angiography, it has been observed that single vessel-disease was present in 52 (32.5%) cases, double vessel-disease in 65 (40.6%) cases and triple vessel-disease in 43 (26.9%) cases. By comparing findings of ECG with coronary angiography, it has been observed that ECG attained Sensitivity of 89.0%, Specificity of 69.2%, PPV of 75.3%, NPV of 85.7% and diagnostic accuracy of 79.4%. Conclusion: It has been concluded that ECG can be a reliable tool for detection of coronary artery disease. Further researches are required to confirm evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhinder et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=160). Electrocardiography (ECG) vs. Coronary angiography was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detection of coronary artery disease (Sensitivity 89.0%, Specificity 69.2%, Diagnostic accuracy 79.4%). Electrocardiography demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.0%, a specificity of 69.2%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 79.4% for detecting coronary artery disease compared to coronary angiography.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: