We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceCaptured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“These findings are important to healthcare providers worldwide as they contradict current assumptions that implementing 0/1-hour testing improves patient management in the ED. It seems that other processes – including specialist review, admissions workflow and bed availability – may have a greater influence on ED length of stay than the testing strategy alone. Approaches such as integrating the 0/1-hour pathway into electronic healthcare records as a clinical decision-support tool may be beneficial to bring the benefits of rapid testing to patients and the healthcare system as a whole.”
“The time point of diagnosis seems to be a different time point from the time point of ED discharge. The availability of nurses and physicians rather than the availability of the information was the rate-limiting step.”
“However, challenges remain in that faster ED diagnostics do not necessarily translate into faster patient care. Once a cardiac troponin result is available, clinicians must still integrate it with the patient's symptoms, electrocardiogram (ECG), history, examination and overall clinical risk before deciding on further investigation, treatment or discharge.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: