Key result
Spinal cord injury linked to ~6-fold higher prevalence of low QRS voltage in Paralympic athletes.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
The prevalence and clinical significance of low QRS voltage in Paralympic athletes, especially those with spinal cord injury, remain unknown.
What is the prevalence and clinical significance of low QRS voltage in Paralympic athletes with versus without spinal cord injuries?
Cross-Sectional (n=193)
What is the prevalence and clinical significance of low QRS voltage in Paralympic athletes with versus without spinal cord injuries?
Low QRS voltage is highly prevalent in Paralympic athletes with spinal cord injury and likely reflects physiological adaptation characterized by smaller cardiac chambers and reduced metabolic drive rather than underlying pathological cardiomyopathy.
May indicate physiological adaptation rather than pathology in SCI athletes; leaves open disability-specific ECG norms for screening.
BACKGROUND: Low QRS voltage (LQRSV) is an uncommon electrocardiographic finding in able-bodied athletes and it is investigated to exclude underlying cardiomyopathy. Its prevalence and clinical meaning in Paralympic athletes (PA), particularly those with spinal cord injury (SCI), remain unknown. OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of LQRSV in elite PA and to explore its associations with cardiac structure and functional parameters, with attention to differences between athletes with and without SCI. METHODS: 193 healthy Olympic PA underwent anthropometric assessment, 12‑lead-ECG, comprehensive echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Athletes were classified according to disability (SCI vs. non-SCI). LQRSV was defined according to international criteria. RESULTS: PA had mean age 32.7 ± 9.7 years, and 44% were females. LQRSV was identified in 22 athletes (11.4%), with a higher prevalence among those with SCI (27.6% vs. 4.6% in NSCI, p < 0.0001). Athletes with LQRSV were older (p = 0.01), frequently involved in skill-based sports (p < 0.0001). Compared with athletes with normal ECG voltages, they exhibited reduced exercise performance (VO2 max 23.1 ± 10.5 vs. 37 ± 14.5 mL/min/kg; p < 0.0001) and lower O2 pulse (p < 0.0001). Echocardiography revealed smaller left ventricular (LV) volumes and LV mass, while systolic function was preserved (p = 0.488). Among SCI athletes, those with LQRSV demonstrated lower W/kg (p = 0.039), lower LV mass (p = 0.037) and higher fat mass (p = 0.035). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, SCI emerged as the only independent correlate of LQRSV (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: LQRSV shows an unexpectedly high prevalence in PA, particularly those with SCI, and may reflect a cardiac phenotype characterized by smaller chambers and reduced metabolic drive, rather than pathological remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gioia et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy Paralympic athletes (n=193). Spinal cord injury (SCI) vs. Non-spinal cord injury (NSCI) was evaluated on Prevalence of low QRS voltage (LQRSV) (p=<0.0001). Spinal cord injury was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of low QRS voltage compared to non-SCI in Paralympic athletes (27.6% vs 4.6%; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: