Key result
Quadruple GDMT at discharge linked to ~29% lower 30-day death or readmission in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Real-world evidence on the prescription of quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy at discharge in patients with HFrEF in Latin America remains limited.
Does quadruple therapy at discharge reduce 30-day death or readmission in patients hospitalized with HFrEF?
Cohort (n=3,839)
No
Does quadruple therapy at discharge reduce 30-day death or readmission in patients hospitalized with HFrEF?
In a real-world Latin American cohort, initiating quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy before discharge for HFrEF is feasible and associated with improved 30-day clinical outcomes.
Supports quadruple GDMT at HFrEF discharge in Latin America; extends real-world data but leaves causal benefit open to randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend early initiation of the 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but real-world evidence on quadruple therapy (QT) at discharge remains limited in Latin America. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with HFrEF discharged from a tertiary cardiovascular center in Colombia (2022-2026). Patients were classified as receiving QT, defined as all 4 GDMT pillars, or incomplete therapy (IT, 0-3 pillars). Propensity-score optimal full matching was performed using 26 covariates. The primary endpoint was 30-day death or readmission. The robustness of the mortality findings was assessed using the primary estimator and 4 sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Among 3839 patients (median age, 68.2 years; 71.2% male), 2758 (71.8%) were discharged on QT. The 30-day composite endpoint occurred in 751 patients (19.6%). QT was associated with a lower risk of death or readmission (RR, 0.71; 95%CI, 0.58-0.88; P = .001). Mortality showed a consistent direction of association (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.37-1.01; P = .052), with the 95%CI excluding unity in all 4 sensitivity analyses. Readmission was lower with QT (cause-specific HR, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.95; P = .017). Findings in the Chagas subgroup (n = 614) were directionally consistent with those in the overall cohort, with no significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction. CONCLUSIONS: In this Latin American HFrEF cohort, QT at discharge was associated with a lower risk of 30-day death or readmission. The magnitude of the mortality association may partly reflect residual confounding rather than a pharmacological effect. These findings support the feasibility of QT prescription in a tertiary care setting in a low- and middle-income country.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Echeverría et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=3,839). Quadruple therapy (all 4 GDMT pillars) vs. Incomplete therapy (0-3 pillars) was evaluated on 30-day death or readmission (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.88, p=.001). Quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF at discharge was associated with a lower risk of 30-day death or readmission versus incomplete therapy (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: