Key result
DCM phenotype shows no association with new-onset ventricular arrhythmias in Titin truncating variant carriers.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Titin truncating variants are linked to arrhythmias before overt ventricular cardiomyopathy, but incidence across ventricular morphofunctional phenotypes is unclear.
Does the presence of overt cardiomyopathy phenotypes (NDLVC or DCM) increase the risk of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias compared to G+/P- disease in patients with titin truncating variants?
Cohort (n=253)
No
Does the presence of overt cardiomyopathy phenotypes (NDLVC or DCM) increase the risk of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias compared to G+/P- disease in patients with titin truncating variants?
Patients with titin truncating variants are at risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac arrest even before the development of overt ventricular cardiomyopathy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ventricular arrhythmia risk appears comparable across titin truncating variant phenotypes; leaves open arrhythmia surveillance needs in phenotype-negative carriers pending prospective data.
BACKGROUND: Titin truncating variants (TTNtvs), the most common genetic cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), are over-represented in early-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and unexplained sudden cardiac arrest/death (SCA/SCD), suggesting they can cause arrhythmias before development of overt ventricular cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the incidence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) between TTNtv-positive patients with genotype-positive but phenotype-negative (G+/P-) disease, nondilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC), and DCM. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,229 patients in our Arrhythmogenic/Dilated Cardiomyopathy Registry was used to identify those with pathogenic/likely pathogenic TTNtvs. Patients were classified as having G+/P- disease, NDLVC, or DCM using the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guideline for cardiomyopathies. The incidence of AF, sustained VA, appropriate defibrillator therapies, SCA, and SCD was ascertained from medical records. RESULTS: Among 253 TTNtv-positive patients (mean age of 45 ± 16 years; 59% male), 54 (21%) were G+/P-, 49 (20%) were NDLVC, and 150 (59%) were DCM. During a median follow-up of 3.8 years at our institution, new-onset AF was seen in 67 patients (26% of those at risk). There was no significant difference in survival from new-onset AF in patients with NDLVC (HR: 3.29; 95% CI: 0.71-15.3; P = 0.13), although DCM was associated with worse AF-free survival (HR: 4.86; 95% CI: 1.17-20.1; P = 0.03). New-onset VAs were seen in 44 (17%) patients during follow-up, including SCA in 12 (5%) patients. There was no association between NDLVC (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.19-2.69; P = 0.62) and DCM (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.37-2.54; P = 0.95) phenotypes compared with G+/P- patients. Cardiac transplantation was done in 14 (6%) patients, and 6 (2%) died of cardiac causes, including 2 cases of SCD. CONCLUSIONS: When stratified by morphofunctional phenotype, there was no difference in VAs across morphofunctional phenotypes in patients with TTNtvs. This highlights that patients with TTNtvs may be at risk of SCA/SCD even without overt ventricular cardiomyopathy. The risk of new-onset AF was highest in patients with DCM but was seen at all phenotypic stages during follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coderre et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Titin truncating variants (TTNtvs) (n=253). Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or nondilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC) phenotype vs. Genotype-positive but phenotype-negative (G+/P-) disease was evaluated on New-onset ventricular arrhythmias (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.37-2.54, p=0.95). In patients with Titin truncating variants, there was no association between the DCM phenotype and new-onset ventricular arrhythmias compared with phenotype-negative patients (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.37-2.54; P=0.95).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: