Key result
High left atrial volumetric-mechanical coupling index linked to ~2.7-fold higher post-STEMI atrial fibrillation risk.
Why the study?
Conventional echocardiographic measures may incompletely capture left atrial remodeling and prediction of atrial fibrillation after STEMI remains challenging.
Does a higher left atrial volumetric-mechanical coupling index (LACI-vm) predict incident atrial fibrillation in post-STEMI patients?
Cohort (n=469)
Does a higher left atrial volumetric-mechanical coupling index (LACI-vm) predict incident atrial fibrillation in post-STEMI patients?
The echocardiographic left atrial volumetric-mechanical coupling index (LACI-vm) is a strong independent predictor of incident atrial fibrillation in patients following a STEMI, offering a novel tool for risk stratification.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly complicates ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Conventional echocardiographic measures may incompletely capture left atrial remodeling. The left atrial volumetric-mechanical coupling index (LACI-vm), integrating left atrial volume index (LAVI) and mitral annular a' velocity, emerges as a novel predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. This study evaluated the association between LACI-vm measured during index hospitalization and incident AF after STEMI and its incremental predictive value beyond clinical and echocardiographic variables. METHODS Consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary coronary angiography from 2017-2023 were retrospectively analyzed. LACI-vm was calculated as LAVI/a'. Patients with prior AF/flutter, non-sinus rhythm during echocardiography, or significant structural heart disease were excluded. Multivariable Cox regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were performed. RESULTS Among 469 patients (64.5 ± 12.5 years, 24.9% female), median LACI-vm was 3.4 (IQR 2.6-4.9). During a median 56-month follow-up (2,193 person-years), 66 patients (14.1%) developed AF, with an incidence rate of 30.1 per 1,000 person-years. AF incidence was higher with LACI-vm >3.4 than ≤3.4 (23.9% vs. 4.3%, 58.0 vs. 8.1 per 1,000 person-years). LACI-vm independently predicted AF (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.33-5.64, p=0.006). ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.857; a cutoff of 4.27 yielded 81% sensitivity and 91% specificity. LACI-vm was not independently associated with mortality. NRI demonstrated improved AF prediction (0.170-0.175, all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS LACI-vm independently predicts post-STEMI AF and may identify patients who could benefit from intensified rhythm monitoring after discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avidan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=469). Left atrial volumetric-mechanical coupling index (LACI-vm) > 3.4 vs. LACI-vm ≤ 3.4 was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.33-5.64, p=0.006). A left atrial volumetric-mechanical coupling index >3.4 independently predicted incident atrial fibrillation after STEMI compared to an index ≤3.4 (HR 2.73; 95% CI 1.33-5.64; p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: