Key result
Remote cardiac rehab boosts post-valve surgery 6-minute walk distance by ~131 meters over usual care.
Why the study?
Does a digital remote Phase-II cardiac rehabilitation program improve functional capacity and quality of life in adult patients recovering from valvular heart surgery compared to usual care?
Does a digital remote Phase-II cardiac rehabilitation program improve functional capacity and quality of life in adult patients recovering from valvular heart surgery compared to usual care?
Absolute Event Rate: 243.17% vs 112.15%
p-value: p=<0.001
A software-driven remote cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improves functional capacity, quality of life, and physical activity adherence compared to usual care in patients following valvular heart surgery.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiandani et al. (2026) studied Valvular heart disease (n=60). Software-driven digital remote phase-2 cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual care was evaluated on Change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) over 12 weeks (p=<0.001). A software-driven remote cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved functional capacity as measured by 6-minute walk distance (mean change 243.17 vs 112.15) and quality of life compared to usual care following valvular surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: