We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceCaptured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The size of the PRESERVE study enabled us to compare the real-world effectiveness of the most widely used antihypertensive medications in children with CKD, and while observational, the results support using RAAS inhibitors as a first-line choice for treating high blood pressure in pediatric CKD.”
“The primary estimand of interest in this study was the effect of initiating calcium channel blockers (CCB) vs initiating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition (RAASi), regardless of treatment changes, which is analogous to an intention-to-treat (ITT) estimand in a randomized clinical trial.... However, because the goal of this project was to guide clinicians in making treatment decisions about first-line therapy, the ITT estimand was most relevant. Subsequent treatment modifications, discontinuation, and switching are considered part of the real-world consequences of the initial treatment.”
“This is a timely and clinically relevant comparative effectiveness study evaluating two of the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive classes in pediatric CKD: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and CCBs. This work should be of particular interest to the pediatric nephrology community, as it addresses a persistent gap between evidence generated under controlled trial conditions and the realities of day-to-day clinical practice. Rather than focusing on efficacy under idealized conditions, the authors directly compare two active, clinically relevant treatment options — precisely the decision clinicians face when selecting initial antihypertensive therapy for children with CKD.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yudai Kaneda (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: