Key result
TTVR achieves mild tricuspid regurgitation in ~95% of patients at 1 year versus medical therapy.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
The TRISCEND II trial aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) with the EVOQUE system compared to medical therapy in patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement improve echocardiographic outcomes and reduce right ventricular congestion in patients with severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation compared to medical therapy?
RCT (n=400)
2:1
Yes
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement improve echocardiographic outcomes and reduce right ventricular congestion in patients with severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation compared to medical therapy?
Absolute Event Rate: 95.3% vs 2.3%
Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement nearly eliminates severe tricuspid regurgitation, which is associated with reduced venous congestion, right ventricular reverse remodeling, and improved forward stroke volume at 1 year.
BACKGROUND The TRISCEND II (EVOQUE Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Pivotal Clinical Investigation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy Using a Novel Device) trial demonstrated clinical benefits for transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) with the EVOQUE system over medical therapy for the primary safety and effectiveness endpoint to 1 year. OBJECTIVES The authors report echocardiographic outcomes at 1 year for the randomized cohort and evaluate hemodynamic and structural changes. METHODS The multicenter, prospective TRISCEND II trial enrolled 400 patients with severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and randomized them in a 2:1 ratio to TTVR (n = 267) or medical therapy (control) (n = 133). The secondary echocardiographic endpoint was reduction in TR severity from baseline to discharge. Echocardiograms were evaluated by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory. RESULTS All patients had severe TR at baseline; at discharge, 95.5% of patients who underwent TTVR had mild TR. On paired analysis from baseline to 1 year, 95.3% of patients who underwent TTVR and 2.3% of control patients achieved mild TR. Between baseline and 1 year, the mean inferior vena cava diameter decreased significantly more for patients who underwent TTVR (normal breathing P < 0.001, forced inhalation P = 0.038). Patients who underwent TTVR experienced greater improvements in diastolic right ventricular (RV) size (P < 0.05) and larger decreases in RV systolic function (P < 0.001), consistent with reduced preload from TR reduction. RV stroke volume and cardiac output increased significantly in patients who underwent TTVR (P < 0.001) but not in control patients. CONCLUSIONS One-year echocardiographic outcomes from the TRISCEND II trial demonstrated that near elimination of TR following TTVR is associated with reduced venous congestion, RV reverse remodeling, and significant improvements in forward stroke volume and cardiac output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sannino et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (n=400). Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) with the EVOQUE system vs. Medical therapy was evaluated on Mild tricuspid regurgitation at 1 year. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement led to 95.3% of patients achieving mild tricuspid regurgitation at 1 year, compared to 2.3% with medical therapy alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: