Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether second whole-brain irradiation is beneficial for patients previously treated with whole-brain irradiation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done for 31 patients with brain metastases who had undergone re-irradiation. Initial whole-brain irradiation was performed with 30 Gy/10 fractions for 87% of these patients. Whole-brain re-irradiation was performed with 30 Gy/10 fractions for 42% of these patients (3-40 Gy/1-20 fractions). Three patients underwent a third whole-brain irradiation. RESULTS: The median interval between the initial irradiation and re-irradiation was 10 months (range: 2-69 months). The median survival time after re-irradiation was 4 months (range: 1-21 months). The symptomatic improvement rate after re-irradiation was 68%, and the partial and complete tumor response rate was 55%. Fifty-two percent of the patients developed Grade 1 acute reactions. On magnetic resonance imaging, brain atrophy was observed in 36% of these patients after the initial irradiation and 74% after re-irradiation. Grade ≥2 encephalopathy or cognitive disturbance was observed in 10 patients (32%) after re-irradiation. Based on univariate analysis, significant factors related to survival after re-irradiation were the location of the primary cancer (P = 0.003) and the Karnofsky performance status at the time of re-irradiation (P = 0.008). A Karnofsky performance status ≥70 was significant based on multivariate analysis (P = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Whole-brain re-irradiation for brain metastases placed only a slight burden on patients and was effective for symptomatic improvement. However, their remaining survival time was limited and the incidence of cognitive disturbance was rather high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunieda et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: