Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, a series of Ni/ZnO–Al 2 O 3 mixed oxide (MO) adsorbents were prepared by the one-step homogeneous precipitation method and the cation–anion double hydrolysis (CADH) method for reactive adsorption desulfurization (RADS) using thiophene as a model fuel in a fixed bed reactor. The synthesized adsorbents were characterized by N 2 sorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), H 2 temperature-programmed reduction (H 2 -TPR), ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and Raman spectroscopy. Results show that both Ni loading and the preparation method have a significant effect on the RADS activities of the adsorbent. Among the studied adsorbents, 10% Ni/ZnO–Al 2 O 3 prepared by the one-step urea precipitation method showed the best RADS performance, with a thiophene conversion up to 96% and a sulfur adsorption capacity of 86 mg of S/g, which is 34% larger than that of CADH adsorbents. In addition, upon five RADS–regeneration cycles, sample 10% Ni/ZnO–Al 2 O 3 exhibited a drop of only 3% in thiophene conversion, indicating the high stability of the Ni/ZnO–Al 2 O 3 adsorbent prepared by homogeneous precipitation. Characterization results show that the one-step homogeneous precipitation method could facilitate the formation of small ZnO particles while suppressing the formation of inactive ZnAl 2 O 4 . On the other hand, by decreasing the formation of NiAl 2 O 4, the homogeneous precipitation method could also generate high concentration of Ni 0 sites, which are the active centers for the hydrogenolysis of C–S bonds. These findings indicate that a high-performance adsorbent for RADS can be obtained by employing a proper preparation method with good control on the adsorbent structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullah et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: