Key result
Multipolar mapping catheter causes left atrial appendage perforation and tamponade requiring open surgical repair during redo PVI.
Why the study?
Cardiac perforation during high-resolution mapping with a multipolar catheter before pulmonary vein isolation is a rare and underreported complication.
Case Report (n=1)
Heightens caution for LAA perforation risk with multipolar mapping in redo PVI; leaves open safer techniques for fragile myocardium.
Key Teaching Points•We present a case of redo pulmonary vein isolation complicated by perforation of the left atrium with a multipolar mapping catheter during electroanatomical mapping at the inferior base of the left atrial appendage (LAA). The cause of the acute cardiac tamponade as demonstrated during surgical repair was a tear in the LAA that might have been facilitated by a local lesion from previous ablation.•The advent of multipolar mapping catheters has greatly increased the speed of obtaining 3-dimensional maps. Their flexible splines are generally not prone to exert extensive pressure on the myocardium. However, advancing the catheter out of a long sheath in close proximity to the atrial wall may cause the catheter to act “like a spear”; therefore, it is safer to advance the catheter to the tip of the sheath and then withdraw the sheath to expose the catheter.•Electroanatomical mapping and image integration allow precise catheter visualization during electrophysiology studies. However, single projections may be misleading. Therefore, catheter position should always be ascertained using different view angles. •We present a case of redo pulmonary vein isolation complicated by perforation of the left atrium with a multipolar mapping catheter during electroanatomical mapping at the inferior base of the left atrial appendage (LAA). The cause of the acute cardiac tamponade as demonstrated during surgical repair was a tear in the LAA that might have been facilitated by a local lesion from previous ablation.•The advent of multipolar mapping catheters has greatly increased the speed of obtaining 3-dimensional maps. Their flexible splines are generally not prone to exert extensive pressure on the myocardium. However, advancing the catheter out of a long sheath in close proximity to the atrial wall may cause the catheter to act “like a spear”; therefore, it is safer to advance the catheter to the tip of the sheath and then withdraw the sheath to expose the catheter.•Electroanatomical mapping and image integration allow precise catheter visualization during electrophysiology studies. However, single projections may be misleading. Therefore, catheter position should always be ascertained using different view angles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=1). Multipolar mapping catheter was evaluated. Use of a multipolar mapping catheter during redo pulmonary vein isolation caused left atrial appendage perforation resulting in cardiac tamponade that required open surgical repair.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: