Penile prosthesis implantation is an established treatment for medically refractory erectile dysfunction, but patient-reported outcomes in men aged ≥80 years remain underexplored. This retrospective single-center study descriptively evaluated satisfaction, functional device use, and postoperative complications among men aged ≥80 years who underwent penile prosthesis implantation between January 2015 and September 2025. Patients aged 75-79 years were included only to provide clinical context rather than to establish comparative equivalence. Satisfaction was assessed during in-person follow-up using a single non-validated 5-point ordinal item. Among 36 included patients, 13 were aged ≥80 years and 23 were aged 75-79 years. In the ≥80-year group, mean satisfaction was 4.54 ± 1.13, median satisfaction was 5.0 (interquartile range 5.0-5.0), 10 of 13 patients (76.9%) selected the maximum score, 11 of 13 (84.6%) reported full functional use, and 3 of 13 (23.1%) experienced any recorded complication. Contextual between-group estimates were imprecise: the mean satisfaction difference was -0.24 points (95% confidence interval -0.95 to 0.47), and the risk difference for maximum satisfaction was -5.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval -34.8 to 19.0). The clustering of scores at 5 indicates a substantial ceiling effect that limits discrimination by the satisfaction item. Selected men aged ≥80 years reported favorable satisfaction and functional use; however, the small, selected cohort, short and variable follow-up, non-validated single-item measure, and wide confidence intervals preclude conclusions regarding equivalence or broader effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saeedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: