Chemotherapy for malaria prevention can be compromised by non-adherence, due to frequent dosing and complex drug regimens. A long-acting injectable (LAI) product that requires a single injection providing protection for several months is under development. This study aimed to assess the acceptability and importance of various attributes of a future LAI for malaria prevention from the perspective of the healthcare providers involved in administration of the injection. Face-to-face interviews were conducted across six malaria-endemic countries with healthcare providers (nurses, physicians and health centre managers) who had administered or supervised administration of ≥5 intramuscular (IM) injections in the last month. The mixed-method survey instrument consisted of a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess trade-offs between attributes of an LAI specifically for use in prevention of malaria among children 2–10 years of age. Respondents also indicated their preferences for an LAI with a 3-month duration of protection versus oral standard-of-care, and for specific LAI attributes by chemoprevention intervention type (intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy, intermittent preventive treatment in school-aged children, mass drug administration in children and adults, perennial malaria chemoprevention in children ≤2 years of age, and seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children <5 years of age). Findings were supplemented with open-ended questions to examine stakeholders perceptions of LAIs characteristics. In the DCE, for children 2–10 years of age, duration of protection was the most discriminant attribute (6 or 9 months vs 3 months). Respondents (N = 242) also preferred fewer injections (1 vs 2 injections) and lower volume (0.5 mL vs 1 or 2 mL). There was a strong preference for IM over subcutaneous (SC) administration, with little difference between location of IM administration (deltoid, gluteal or thigh). Across intervention types and age groups, the 3-month LAI was preferred to oral standard of care by 76–86% of respondents. The preferred site of injection varied by intervention, but preference for SC administration was low across all intervention types (2–7%). A median of 2.0 injections per year was considered most acceptable. These findings suggest that an IM-administered LAI with duration of protection of 3 months may be acceptable across chemoprevention intervention types and preferable to orally administered drugs. These insights will inform further product development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Audibert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: