Mountainous rural areas face significant challenges for last-mile parcel delivery due to low demand density, poor road conditions, and high transportation costs. This study develops a cost-benefit analysis framework to compare electric vehicle (EV) and drone delivery modes in mountainous terrain. The framework includes a slope-dependent energy consumption model for EVs, a three-dimensional grid-based path planning algorithm for drones accounting for vertical takeoff and landing costs, and optimization models for charging station placement and signal relay tower deployment. Using empirical data from a postal delivery network in mountainous ZhaoDian Township, China, we find that EV delivery is more cost-effective for high-demand, clustered areas, while drone delivery is economically viable for remote, low-demand destinations with limited road access. Demand uncertainty and weather-related flight cancellations reduce the economic viability of drone-only systems. Based on these findings, we derive policy recommendations for establishing a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis framework to evaluate EV and UAV delivery in mountainous regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: