Gastric cancer (GC) poses a distinct modeling challenge. The disease varies by region, histology, metastatic site, and treatment history. It also develops within a gastric niche shaped by acid, mucus, polarity, microbes, and stroma. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) can preserve tumor-linked epithelial states and support living biobanks. They also enable genotype-phenotype studies and functional testing of therapeutic vulnerabilities. Their clinical value depends on representation, not model complexity alone. The assay must also return clear results within a useful clinical window. This review evaluates GC PDOs as functional companion models for precision oncology rather than stand-alone treatment decision tools. We discuss four barriers that limit clinical readiness. Establishment bias reduces representation of diffuse-type, scirrhous, and signet-ring cell carcinomas. Standard organoid lumens do not reproduce gastric acidity, stratified mucus, or Helicobacter pylori-driven polarity loss. Long-term expansion can select culture-adapted clones and weaken clinical representativeness. PDO drug screening also remains difficult to align with urgent treatment timelines. Fresh-sample assays may shorten turnaround time but reduce scale and depth. We further highlight biological insights gained from GC organoids. These include niche independence, epigenetic dependencies, ARID1A-linked vulnerabilities, and chemotherapy resistance. We propose a readiness framework based on six criteria: tumor authenticity, subtype coverage, niche fidelity, turnaround time, assay standards, and outcome validation. This framework may help define where GC PDOs can support clinical reasoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: