To examine the association between subjective sleep regularity and self-reported health loss among older adults, and to assess whether this association differs by frailty status. This multisite cross-sectional study included 6,770 adults aged 60–100 years from four Chinese sites surveyed from June to August 2024. Sleep regularity was assessed using the six-item Sleep Regularity Questionnaire (SRQ). Primary outcomes were EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) problem count, EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and physical, mental, and activity-limited unhealthy days. Frailty was classified as robust, prefrail, or frail using the FRAIL scale. Multiple imputation, linear and negative-binomial regression, two-part models, restricted cubic splines, and frailty interaction analyses were used with false discovery rate correction. Each 1-SD higher SRQ score was associated with fewer EQ-5D problems (β = −0.041, 95% CI − 0.079 to − 0.004), higher EQ-VAS (β = 0.64, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.08), and fewer physical (IRR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99), mental (IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.92), and activity-limited unhealthy days (IRR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91). Absolute differences in unhealthy days were each less than half a day per 30 days. Four outcomes showed evidence of nonlinearity, and two-part models indicated that unhealthy-day associations were concentrated mainly in the occurrence of any unhealthy day. Associations differed by frailty status for EQ-VAS and all three unhealthy-day outcomes after FDR correction, with inverse associations generally more evident among robust or prefrail participants. After separate adjustment for insomnia severity or sleep quality, mental and activity-limited unhealthy days remained significant, whereas other associations were attenuated. Greater subjective sleep regularity was associated with modestly lower multidimensional self-reported health loss, with heterogeneity across frailty states. Sleep regularity may provide complementary information within multidimensional sleep assessment in later life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: