Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates are prone to delamination because they lack continuous through-thickness reinforcement. Although multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) interlayers can improve interlaminar resistance, evidence has focused mainly on unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and individual fracture modes. This study compared Mode I propagation and Mode II initiation toughness in CFRP, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), and two carbon/glass hybrid laminates (HCRP and HGRP). Each system included unmodified (ORI), neat-epoxy interlayer (CON), and 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 wt.% MWCNT conditions. The laminates were fabricated by N,N-dimethylformamide-assisted ultrasonication and hot pressing, and examined by ASTM D5528 double cantilever beam testing, ASTM D7905 end-notched flexure testing, and scanning electron microscopy. ORI and CON exhibited comparable toughness, indicating little contribution from the neat-epoxy interlayer alone. In all four systems, both toughness measures increased from 0.1 to 0.3 wt.% and decreased at 0.5 wt.%. At 0.3 wt.%, steady-state Mode I toughness increased by 31.2–51.2% and Mode II initiation toughness increased by 4.0–23.1% relative to CON. GFRP showed the highest absolute Mode I toughness, HCRP showed the largest Mode II improvement, and HGRP exhibited limited Mode II sensitivity. Matrix tearing, shear cusps, tortuous crack features, and distributed MWCNT pull-out at 0.3 wt.% contrasted with smoother regions, bundled or agglomerate-like structures, and cavities or pores at 0.5 wt.%. The effective MWCNT content therefore reflects a balance between nanotube-mediated energy dissipation and defect formation, modulated by fiber architecture and fracture mode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: