Backgroud: Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) studies in breast cancer often combine heterogeneous practices and supplementary products, complicating interpretation of prevalence estimates. This study examined recent use of questionnaire-listed T&CM practices and supplementary products among breast cancer patients attending follow-up care in Sarawak, Malaysia, and explored variation in combined use across participant characteristics and reasons for no listed use. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among 431 adults attending breast cancer follow-up at Sarawak General Hospital from June 2023 to August 2024. Combined use was defined as reporting at least one listed T&CM practice or supplementary product during the preceding six months. Frequencies and percentages summarised reported practices, products, and reasons for no listed use. Pearson chi-square tests examined differences in combined-use status across participant characteristics. Results: Overall, 298 participants (69.1%) met the combined-use definition. However, only 51 participants (17.1% of combined users; 11.8% of the total sample) reported at least one listed traditional practice. Supplementary products predominated, especially fortified milk or colostrum (182/298, 61.1%) and vitamins or minerals (158/298, 53.0%). Combined-use status differed significantly by age group (p = .033), ethnicity (p = .018), residence (p = .018), and educational attainment (p = .048), but not household income, employment status, or cancer stage. Among 133 participants reporting no listed use, 99 (74.4%) had not considered T&CM. Conclusion: The high combined-use estimate was driven mainly by supplementary products rather than traditional therapeutic practices. Distinguishing practices from products provides a more meaningful account of patient behaviour and supports more precise, nonjudgmental oncology follow-up discussions. Future research should examine product formulation, dose, purpose, disclosure, expenditure, and timing in relation to cancer treatment within culturally diverse cancer care settings such as Sarawak.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yap et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: