Objective: To evaluate inter-surgeon variability in mediolateral joint balance assessment during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the robotic surgical assistant (ROSA) Knee System, and to determine whether such variability influences the surgical planning generated by this system. Methods: An observational study was conducted including 101 patients undergoing primary robotic-assisted TKA. Two experienced surgeons independently assessed intraoperative mediolateral laxity by manually applying varus–valgus stress across six predefined flexion angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, and 120°). Measurements of medial and lateral gaps (mm) and varus–valgus alignment (°) were recorded using the ROSA Knee System. Inter-observer differences were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The impact of inter-surgeon variability on surgical planning, including bone resection and compartmental space measurement parameters, was also evaluated. Results: No statistically significant inter-observer differences were observed in mediolateral gap measurements or varus–valgus alignment across all flexion angles (p > 0.05). Inter-observer reliability for varus–valgus measurements was good to excellent in extension and early flexion (ICC 0.86–0.91), decreased to moderate at 90° (ICC 0.68–0.74) and was poor for varus assessment at 120° (ICC 0.46, 95% CI 0.29–0.60). For gap measurements, reliability was excellent for the medial gap and good for the lateral gap in extension (ICC 0.93 and 0.89, respectively), and moderate for both gaps at 90° (ICC 0.71–0.74). No significant inter-observer differences were found in cut or space measurements, with excellent agreement for cut parameters (ICC > 0.95). Conclusions: Inter-surgeon assessment of mediolateral joint balance during robot-assisted TKA showed good-to-excellent reproducibility in extension and early flexion, with reduced reproducibility in deep flexion. Statistically significant inter-observer differences were not observed in the resulting cut and space measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: