Prediction Before Publication: Dated Zimmerman Forecasts Compared with MUSE-DARK III, MIGHTEE-HI/LADUMA, and JUNO

We audit dated forecasts in the Zimmerman programme against later 2026 results, retaining their original versions and assumptions. Public Zenodo records created March 19-20 establish that a rising acceleration-scale forecast, a₀(z) = a₀(0)E(z), preceded MUSE-DARK III's April 24 submission. Using unchanged constants from the March 17 Git calculation, the forecast lies within 4.8% of MUSE's subsequently published MOND-based central redshift relation across 0.33 < z < 1.44. The public paper's slightly different local normalization gives a similarly close central-curve agreement. These are comparisons with a fitted, model-dependent relation, not a new raw-data likelihood test. The August MIGHTEE-HI/LADUMA result is compatible with a later constant-vacuum branch without selecting it over mild evolution. A March public solar-angle formula is compatible with JUNO's September update at 1.06 quoted standard errors; an older speculative mass-splitting ratio is 1.33% below the ratio computed from JUNO's normal-ordering results. Conflicting archived formulas are disclosed. Public advance publication and close numerical agreements are established; uniqueness, a new physical derivation, and formal statistical confirmation of the acceleration forecast are not.