Background Use of contraceptive among international university students remains under-explored. This study examined contraceptive use at last sex among international students in Australia, comparing Chinese (the largest source-country group) with non-Chinese students. Methods Prevalences of types of contraceptive method used at last sex were examined for unmarried sexually active international students aged 18–34 years in an Australian university-based cross-sectional survey. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify international students’ socio-demographic factors associated with types of contraceptive use at last sex. Results Of 442 Chinese and 651 non-Chinese international students, 97.7% and 96.3%, respectively reported using any contraceptive at last sex. Most Chinese international students reported using a condom at last sex (91.6%) compared with 69.3% of their non-Chinese peers. Compared with non-Chinese students, Chinese international students were less likely to use short-acting contraceptives (10.9% vs 27.8%), long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) (0.2% vs 8.8%), provider-dependent contraceptives (11.1% vs 36.1%), and concurrent contraceptives (13.1% vs 29.5%) at last sex. Among all international students, accessing more sex education sources in the past was associated with higher odds of short-acting, provider-dependent, LARC, and concurrent contraceptive use at last sex. Higher perceived social support was associated with increased odds of LARC and provider-dependent contraceptive use at last sex. Conclusions There are substantial differences in use of the more effective contraceptives between Chinese and non-Chinese international students. Ensuring equitable access to contraceptive information and culturally tailored services represents a significant opportunity for universities to support international students’ reproductive autonomy and wellbeing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: