Ethnic dance involves large-amplitude and repetitive movements that may impose substantial and uneven mechanical demands on the musculoskeletal system, potentially increasing the risk of joint and soft-tissue injuries. Conventional injury assessment relies largely on manual observation and clinical evaluation, which limits the ability to continuously and quantitatively characterize movement-related risk. To address this limitation, this study proposed a Cross-Modal Attention-based Injury Risk Perception Network (CMA-IRPN) for non-contact movement analysis, movement-pattern risk screening, and injury risk assessment in ethnic dance. The framework jointly modeled Red, Green, and Blue (RGB) video sequences and human skeletal keypoints. A dual-branch encoder combining a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) and a graph convolutional network (GCN) was used to extract spatiotemporal visual and skeletal features, while spatiotemporal cross-modal attention modules were introduced to model interactions between movement appearance and joint-topological information. The model was evaluated for movement recognition using the publicly available MPII Human Pose and SportsPose datasets and for movement-pattern risk grading using a self-constructed ethnic dance dataset. CMA-IRPN achieved accuracies of 96.03% and 94.86% on the MPII and SportsPose datasets, respectively, with statistically significant improvements over the comparison models (p < 0.05). On the ethnic dance dataset, the model achieved a Macro-F1 score of 92.25% for movement-pattern risk grading and a sensitivity of 93.75% for the high-risk category. These results suggest that CMA-IRPN can identify risk-related movement patterns from non-contact multimodal data and provide quantitative support for movement screening and injury risk assessment in ethnic dance training. The predicted risk levels represent visual-kinematic movement patterns rather than direct measurements of joint torque, tissue stress, or other mechanical loads and therefore should not be interpreted as operational real-time injury early warnings or as substitutes for clinical biomechanical assessment or medical diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: