The paper argues that though we usually think of the prophets as social or moral critics, their principal concern is idolatry. They oppose the unique God YHWH to the Ba’alim – still familiar to us in terms of a particular community, nation, religion, money, sex, and so forth. YHWH's particularity required in response a community committed to the world made otherwise than taken-for-granted norms suggest. This calls in question the idea that the prophets were drawing on the consensus gentium in their warnings. If we are looking for contemporary prophets, I suggest some contemporary meteorological scientists qualify. However, according to Paul, following Num 11, all the Lord's people are prophets. The burden is laid on the community as a whole, but it is laid alongside a commitment to reconciliation, and being both prophets and reconcilers is a complex task in which the Quaker witness has something to teach us.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tim Gorringe (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: