The inability to restrict acute myeloid leukemia immunotherapy to leukemic cells without damaging normal hematopoiesis remains a central challenge. Graft engineering addresses this limitation by modifying donor hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells so that the reconstituting hematopoietic system becomes resistant to a selected immunotherapy while residual leukemia remains susceptible. I examine the molecular principles, target-specific constraints, pharmacological consequences, and translational implications of this strategy across five validated immunotargets: CD33, CD123, FLT3, KIT, and CD45. These targets span a spectrum from dispensable lineage antigens to essential signaling receptors and pan-hematopoietic conditioning targets, requiring either antigen deletion or function-preserving epitope substitution. Beyond preventing hematopoietic toxicity, graft engineering redistributes therapeutic engagement by remodeling normal antigen-expressing hematopoiesis, thereby influencing the efficacy and toxicity of antibody- and chimeric antigen receptor–based therapies. I outline a translational path from single-edited grafts toward multiplex platforms designed to improve disease control while limiting antigen escape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernhard Lehnertz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: