The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the urgent need for stable vaccine provision worldwide. This paper examines how three Asian countries developed technological, regulatory, market-enabling, and coordination capabilities for vaccine provision during the COVID-19 crisis, with particular attention to the catalytic role of institutional capacity in reshaping vaccine-sector incentive mechanisms. Using a comparative institutional analysis, the study compares Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on semi-structured interviews and secondary sources, the analysis shows that while COVID-19 acted as a catalyst, outcomes varied significantly across the selected countries because of differences in pre-existing capabilities. The study argues that even during a crisis, institutional transformation remains strongly path-dependent and incremental: crisis arrangements reverted once pressure receded, while those bound by contract or market instruments remained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iizuka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: