This study reports the development, optimization and mechanistic evaluation of bio-based cellulose/lignin–tannin membrane adsorbents for the removal of representative inorganic and organic water pollutants: Cr(VI), Pb2+, difenoconazole (DFC) and bisphenol A (BPA). Waste cellulose fibers (wCF) from cigarette-package paperboard were converted into reactive membrane constituents by amino/ester and epoxy functionalization and subsequently cross-linked with epoxy-modified kraft lignin (EpKL), with or without tannic acid (TA), yielding wCF/EpKL and wCF/EpKL/TA membranes. Response surface methodology was used to optimize formulation parameters, while structural, morphological, and physicochemical analyses supported successful functionalization, cross-linking, and formation of porous, structurally modified surfaces. At 298 K, the Langmuir adsorption capacities of wCF/EpKL/wCF/EpKL/TA reached 85.37/88.78 mg g−1 for Cr(VI), 155.6/163.9 mg g−1 for Pb2+, 51.80/84.49 mg g−1 for DFC, and 194.4/195.4 mg g−1 for BPA, respectively. Isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic analyses indicated favorable, heterogeneous, and spontaneous adsorption involving specific surface interactions and diffusion-related contributions. Spectroscopy-supported mechanistic interpretation suggested that metal species are retained mainly through complexation with amino, phenolic, and oxygen-containing groups, together with electrostatic interactions, whereas DFC and BPA adsorption involves hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and π–π interactions with lignin/tannin aromatic domains. Fixed-bed experiments confirmed the applicability of the membranes under continuous-flow conditions, while regeneration, stabilization/degradation, and soil-burial tests supported their potential within a more sustainable water treatment cycle. Overall, the results demonstrate that waste-derived cellulose/lignin–tannin membranes are promising regenerable sorbents for the adsorption of chemically diverse inorganic and organic pollutants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marinković et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: