Key result
Low-cost BITalino heart-rate monitoring matches research-grade BIOPAC with under ~5% variance between devices.
Why the study?
Accurate heart rate monitoring in fish eco-physiological studies relies on expensive tools, motivating validation of a low-cost open-hardware system.
p-value: p=not significant
Statistical equivalence study demonstrates accurate heart rate tracking by open-source hardware in fish, indicating an accessible alternative to expensive recording systems.
Monitoring heart rate (fH) accurately is fundamental for fish eco-physiological studies. However, these measurements rely heavily on expensive experimental tools. Here, we aimed to validate BITalino, an inexpensive, open-hardware biosignal acquisition system for measuring fH that could help to democratize research in fish physiology. BITalino is a modular electrophysiological system with a dedicated electrocardiogram (ECG) module that records ECG signals through electrodes connected to the module via lead wires and attached directly to the subject. We compared BITalino with a widely used research-grade physiological recording system (BIOPAC) by measuring fH in fish using both devices simultaneously. Heart-rate measurements did not differ significantly between devices, and there was no significant Device×Time interaction, indicating that both systems tracked temporal variation similarly. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) showed that 85.9% of the variance was due to biological differences between fish, with less than 5% from device-related variance. These results confirm that BITalino can be effectively used for fH monitoring in fish physiology studies. Beyond its low cost, its portability, modular design, open-hardware architecture and compatibility with third-party analysis software make it easily adaptable for different experimental applications, and may facilitate its use in resource-limited research settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pettinau et al. (2026) studied Fish physiological heart rate monitoring. BITalino (open-hardware biosignal acquisition system) vs. BIOPAC (research-grade physiological recording system) was evaluated on Heart rate (fH) (p=not significant). Heart-rate monitoring in fish using the low-cost BITalino system was equivalent to the research-grade BIOPAC system, with less than 5% of measurement variance attributed to device differences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: