Key result
Cryopreserved grafts show early subclinical diastolic changes without increasing symptomatic cardiotoxicity vs fresh grafts.
Why the study?
The impact of dimethyl sulfoxide used in cryopreserved grafts on cardiac function after allogeneic HSCT remains unclear.
Does exposure to cryopreserved grafts containing DMSO worsen early echocardiographic parameters or increase the risk of cardiotoxicity in adults undergoing allogeneic HSCT?
Cohort (n=96)
No
Does exposure to cryopreserved grafts containing DMSO worsen early echocardiographic parameters or increase the risk of cardiotoxicity in adults undergoing allogeneic HSCT?
Odds Ratio: 2.74 (95% CI 0.29–25.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.8% vs 2.7%
p-value: p=0.37
Global longitudinal strain is a sensitive predictor of early cardiotoxicity following HSCT, and DMSO exposure via cryopreserved grafts may contribute to early subclinical diastolic dysfunction.
Cryopreserved grafts were associated with early diastolic changes post-HSCT; leaves open long-term risk and need for prospective validation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of cryopreserved grafts in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) increased substantially. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), used as a cryoprotective agent, is well recognized for its infusion-related toxicity; however, its impact on cardiac function remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective study included 96 consecutive patients (median age 46 years) undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Patients were divided according to graft type into cryopreserved (n = 59, 61.5%) and non-cryopreserved (n = 37, 38.5%) groups. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment was performed before and after transplantation. RESULTS: Significant changes were observed in diastolic parameters (E/A, and E/E'), structural parameters (left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass index), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and right ventricular ejection fraction following HSCT. In the cryopreserved group, E/A ratio decreased below the normal range and E/E' ratio increased significantly, whereas no such changes were observed in the non-cryopreserved group. During the 30-day follow-up period, symptomatic cardiovascular toxicity occurred in 5 patients (5.2%), while subclinical cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction was detected in 16 patients (16.7%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that GLS predicted cardiotoxicity with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98; p < 0.0001). At a cut-off value of - 16.8%, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 79%. CONCLUSION: Cryopreserved graft administration may be associated with early alterations in left ventricular diastolic function, potentially reflecting DMSO-related cardiotoxicity. GLS appears to be a sensitive marker for the early detection and prediction of cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lábska et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n=96). Cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell grafts (DMSO exposure) vs. Non-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell grafts was evaluated on Symptomatic cardiovascular toxicity at 30 days (OR 2.74, 95% CI 0.29-25.5, p=0.37). Administration of cryopreserved grafts was associated with early subclinical alterations in diastolic function but did not significantly increase symptomatic cardiotoxicity (OR 2.74) compared to non-cryopreserved grafts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: