Key result
Drug-induced pericardial disorders are linked to ~14% higher reporting odds of death in females.
Why the study?
Drug-associated pericardial syndromes are underreported and require characterization of reporting features and identification of disproportionality signals across suspect drugs and classes.
Do specific drug classes generate disproportional safety signals for pericardial disorders in the FAERS database?
Observational (n=12,106)
Do specific drug classes generate disproportional safety signals for pericardial disorders in the FAERS database?
This pharmacovigilance analysis identifies antineoplastic, immunomodulating, and antithrombotic agents as having significant reporting signals for pericardial disorders, highlighting a need for heightened vigilance for drug-induced pericardial syndromes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant sex-stratified vigilance for pericardial events; leaves open causal confirmation in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pericardial syndromes cause significant morbidity, decreased quality of life, and rarely mortality. Drug-associated pericardial syndromes are underreported. This study characterized reports of pericardial disorders, described demographic and reporting features, and identified disproportionality signals across suspect drugs and therapeutic classes. METHODS: This study analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System reports from January 2000 to March 2025, using predefined preferred terms for pericardial syndromes. Duplicate and pediatric reports (<18 years) were excluded, resulting in 12,106 unique reports. A lower 90% confidence limit of the Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EB05)>2 and a lower limit of the 95% credibility interval of the Information Component (IC025)>0 were indicators of signals. RESULTS: Raw counts of reports increased from 133 in 2000 to 939 in 2024. The cohort had a balanced sex distribution and a mean age of 55.5 years. Among females, antineoplastic (e.g., rituximab, EB05 = 13.3, IC025 = 3.7) and immunomodulating agents (e.g., adalimumab, EB05 = 3.1, IC025 = 1.6) were most frequently suspected. Among males, antithrombotic agents (e.g., aspirin, EB05 = 7.1, IC025 = 2.8) predominated. A higher age-adjusted reporting odds of death was observed in females versus males (OR=1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.25; deaths: females n=1,030, males n=925). DISCUSSION: Raw report counts of pericardial syndromes increased over 25 years, supporting heightened vigilance for drug-induced etiologies. Sex-stratified drug rankings were exploratory and do not demonstrate drug-by-sex interactions. The results extend the existing literature by providing a broad descriptive overview of the reporting landscape for pericardial disorders within a national spontaneous reporting system. CONCLUSIONS: Immunomodulating, antineoplastic, and antithrombotic agents generated reporting signals involving pericardial disorders, with sex-based differences and reported drug classes and outcomes. These findings do not establish causality and warrant confirmatory studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCall et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pericardial disorders (n=12,106). Suspect drugs (antineoplastic, immunomodulating, and antithrombotic agents) was evaluated on Age-adjusted reporting odds of death (females vs males) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.25). Antineoplastic, immunomodulating, and antithrombotic agents generated reporting signals for pericardial disorders, with higher reporting odds of death in females vs males (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.25).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: