Single-number ratings are widely used in building acoustics, but they are meaningful only when the reference-curve procedure is applied correctly and the reported descriptors are matched to the physical problem. This study re-evaluates accredited in situ measurements of airborne and impact sound insulation for a timber-frame interfloor construction at the Archaeological Museum of Istria, Croatia. Applying the measured one-third-octave spectra in 1 dB reference-curve steps according to ISO 717 gives R′w = 55 dB and L′n,w = 62 dB. Both values satisfy the historical Croatian requirements that applied at the time of measurement. For the meeting-room source context, the ISO 717-1 adaptation term C = −3 dB gives R′w + C = 52 dB; Ctr is not used in the internal-partition analysis because it represents a low-frequency-rich, traffic-oriented source spectrum. The impact receiving-room volume is 95.4 m3. A separate diffuse-field scenario estimates how certified broadband absorption would change the unnormalized receiving-room level Li(f); it is not treated as a change in L′n,w, and no band-by-band 60 dB compliance threshold is applied. A separate sensitivity analysis of floating-floor resonance gives f0 = 28–89 Hz over the selected mass–stiffness range, with an as-built estimate of about 53 Hz. The paper therefore distinguishes measured apparent sound insulation, source-spectrum context, receiving-room response, and analytical sensitivity without presenting the scenario calculations as validated acoustic optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kršulja et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: