Key result
High heart failure polygenic risk score linked to ~5-fold higher rate of new-onset HF.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
The clinical utility of a heart failure polygenic risk score to predict new-onset heart failure across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk was uncertain.
Does a heart failure polygenic risk score independently predict incident heart failure in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk?
Cohort (n=74,897)
Yes
Does a heart failure polygenic risk score independently predict incident heart failure in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk?
Hazard Ratio: 5 (95% CI 3.99–6.27)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.5% vs 0.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
A heart failure polygenic risk score provides independent and complementary prediction of incident heart failure beyond established clinical risk factors across diverse cardiovascular risk profiles.
Background The clinical utility of a heart failure (HF) polygenic risk score (PRS) is uncertain. Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of an HF PRS to predict new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk. Methods An HF PRS (>1 million single nucleotide variations) was used to stratify individuals from 7 clinical studies to low (quintile [Q] 1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk. In 6 trials of patients at elevated cardiovascular risk, HRs adjusted for clinical factors were derived for the risk of hospitalization for HF using Cox-PH models, and discrimination and calibration was explored. Analyses were conducted in a separate data set of individuals at low cardiovascular risk. Results We studied 74,897 patients without HF, of which 51,627 were at elevated cardiovascular risk (median age 65 years; 71% men; median follow-up 2.5 years). After adjusting for clinical factors, individuals with intermediate and high HF PRS carried a 2- and 5-fold increased rate of new-onset HF, respectively (intermediate risk: HRadj: 2.01 [95% CI: 1.62-2.49]; P < 0.001; high-risk: HRadj: 5.00 [95% CI: 3.99-6.27]; P < 0.001). Addition of the HF PRS to a clinical model improved the AUC (0.787 [95% CI: 0.775-0.798] to 0.822 [95% CI: 0.811-0.832]). Results were consistent in 23,270 individuals at low cardiovascular risk over 20-year follow-up. Conclusions An HF PRS is a strong and independent predictor for new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk. The polygenic contribution to HF is complementary to established clinical risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haller et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Patients without prior heart failure across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk (n=74,897). High heart failure polygenic risk score (top 20%) vs. Low heart failure polygenic risk score (bottom 20%) was evaluated on Hospitalization for heart failure (new-onset HF) (HR 5.00, 95% CI 3.99-6.27, p=<0.001). Individuals with a high heart failure polygenic risk score had a 5-fold higher rate of developing new-onset heart failure compared to those with a low genetic risk (HR 5.00, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: