Ischemic stroke triggers neuroinflammation that can drive CNS injury-induced immunodepression syndrome (CIDS), a peripheral immunosuppressive state associated with increased infection risk. The endocannabinoid system, particularly cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2), represents a promising immunomodulatory target because of its anti-inflammatory actions and limited psychoactive liability. In this study, we investigated whether CB2 receptor activation confers neuroprotection and preserves systemic immune responsiveness in a murine photothrombotic stroke (PTS) model. Male C57BL/6 mice underwent PTS or sham surgery and were treated before stroke induction with the non-selective CB1/CB2 agonist WIN-55212, receptor antagonists, the selective CB2 agonist HU-308, or vehicle. Neurological deficits, infarct volume, cerebral inflammatory gene expression, and intestinal leukocyte-endothelial interactions following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge were assessed using Neuroscore, TTC staining, RT-qPCR, and intravital microscopy. SIM-A9 microglia were used to evaluate the effects of HU-308 on viability and cytokine release under inflammatory conditions. PTS induced a CIDS-like phenotype characterized by reduced baseline leukocyte rolling and a markedly blunted leukocyte adhesion response following LPS challenge. Non-selective cannabinoid receptor activation improved neurological scores and reduced infarct size, while CB2 blockade abolished this protection. Selective CB2 activation with HU-308 reduced infarct volume, improved neurological outcome, and suppressed stroke-associated TNF and IL-6 expression in the ischemic hemisphere. In vitro, HU-308 reduced TNF release from LPS-stimulated microglia, while IL-4 enhanced microglial viability and IL-10 production. Importantly, HU-308 preserved leukocyte adhesion after LPS challenge following stroke, suggesting maintained peripheral immune responsiveness. These findings identify CB2 receptor activation as a promising neuroimmune strategy that limits acute stroke injury while attenuating the development of CIDS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bietar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: