Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Brainstem morphometry on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides quantitative information on age-related structural variation.Although previous studies have reported brainstem dimensions in different populations, the relationship between age and anteroposterior (AP) brainstem dimensions remains incompletely characterized in imaging-normal clinical cohorts.This study evaluated age-and sex-related variation in the AP diameters of the midbrain, pons, and medulla in adults undergoing brain MRI.Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 140 adults (70 males and 70 females) aged ≥18 years who underwent brain MRI for non-brainstem-related clinical indications and demonstrated no brainstem abnormalities.MRI examinations were performed using a 3.0-Tesla Philips Ingenia MRI system (Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V., Best, The Netherlands).AP diameters of the midbrain, pons, and medulla were measured on midsagittal T1-weighted images using electronic calipers.Differences between sexes were assessed using independent-samples t-tests, while differences across five age categories (18-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, and >60 years) were assessed using one-way analysis of variance with post-hoc testing.Age was also analyzed as a continuous variable using regression models adjusted for sex.Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York).Results: The mean AP diameters of the midbrain, pons, and medulla were 16.84 ± 1.50 mm, 22.06 ± 1.45 mm, and 12.74 ± 1.06 mm, respectively.No statistically significant sex differences were observed for the midbrain (t(138) = -1.96,p = 0.052), pons (t(138) = 0.15, p = 0.885), or medulla (t(138) = 1.33, p = 0.185), although a marginal trend was observed for the midbrain (p = 0.052).Midbrain AP diameter differed across age categories (F(4,135) = 7.29, p < 0.001, η² = 0.178), with the smallest mean diameter in participants aged >60 years.Post-hoc analysis showed greater midbrain diameters in the 18-30, 31-40, and 41-50-year groups than in the >60-year group.Pons diameter showed an overall age-group difference (F(4,135) = 2.73, p = 0.032, η² = 0.075), but no individual pairwise comparison was statistically significant.Medulla diameter did not differ significantly across age groups (F(4,135) = 0.41, p = 0.803, η² = 0.012).In sex-adjusted continuous-age regression, midbrain AP diameter showed an inverse association with age (β = -0.036mm/year, t(137) = -5.23,95% CI: -0.050 to -0.023, p < 0.001), whereas associations were not statistically significant for the pons (β = -0.002mm/year, t(137) = -0.27,95% CI: -0.016 to 0.013, p = 0.793) or medulla (β = -0.005mm/year, t(137) = -0.98,95% CI: -0.015 to 0.005, p = 0.333).No statistically significant age-by-sex interactions were identified.Conclusions: In this single-center study of an imaging-normal clinical cohort, midbrain AP diameter demonstrated an age-associated reduction, whereas the pons and medulla showed no significant linear age association.No statistically significant sex differences or age-by-sex interactions were identified.These findings provide exploratory baseline measurements of brainstem AP dimensions in an imaging-normal clinical cohort and support further investigation using larger multicenter cohorts, standardized MRI protocols, reproducibility assessment, and three-dimensional or automated morphometric approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: