Bedding orientation affects coal strength and the interpretation of acoustic-emission (AE) signals, but detected activity and retrospective sequence descriptors have different monitoring meanings. Twelve coal specimens were tested under uniaxial compression, with three at each bedding angle of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. Their mean peak stresses were 11.713 ± 1.412, 7.122 ± 1.064, 3.696 ± 0.667, and 10.357 ± 1.138 MPa, respectively (mean ± sample standard deviation). Detailed AE analysis remains limited to one specimen per orientation. For those four records, an event-index partition analysis at moment orders of −5 to 5 gives generalized-dimension ranges of 0.750, 0.552, 0.867, and 0.808 and spectrum widths of 0.925, 0.857, 1.088, and 0.987. Scale-range sensitivity, moment-range sensitivity, and temporal shuffling limit their interpretation to finite-scale heterogeneity. Independently estimated detrended-fluctuation slopes range from 0.597 to 0.775 and do not establish stationary long-range memory. Right-ended windows describe evolving AE structure without future observations, but no validated warning lead time is established. The mechanical results show an intermediate-angle strength minimum within the tested specimens; the AE observations support conditional mechanism hypotheses requiring replicate AE analysis and independent temporal and spatial validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: