Background: Premenstrual symptoms are common among young women and may lead to repeated self-management and medication use. However, medication-related behaviors may vary across academic disciplines, and it remains unclear whether favorable medication-safety attitudes are reflected consistently in everyday behavior. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated medication-related, self-care, complementary, and healthcare-seeking behaviors among female undergraduate students reporting premenstrual symptoms at Çukurova University, Türkiye, between January and June 2024. Data from 479 students across five faculties were collected using a 53-item, study-specific questionnaire covering sociodemographic characteristics, symptom-management practices, healthcare-seeking behavior, medication use, self-medication, complementary and herbal product use, and medication-related attitudes. Associations between categorical variables were examined using Pearson’s chi-square test, with Cramer’s V reported as a measure of effect size. Results: Among participants, 88.1% reported regular menstrual cycles, and 30.5% reported previous education on premenstrual symptom management. Family members or friends were the most frequently reported source of advice (47.4%), followed by physicians (27.6%). Analgesics were commonly used (71.0%), 39.9% reported using medications already available at home, and 78.4% of medical students agreed that they used analgesics without physician recommendation. Herbal or aromatherapy-based approaches were reported by 29.9% of participants. Faculty-level differences were observed in medication-related behaviors, attitudes toward complementary approaches, and information-seeking patterns. Conclusions: Medical students reported more cautious attitudes toward herbal safety and informal information sources, although self-medication-related behaviors remained common. These findings support university-based health promotion strategies that emphasize practical medication-safety skills, appropriate healthcare seeking, evidence-based self-care, responsible use of complementary products, and critical evaluation of digital health information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kıroğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: