Multi-epoch point-cloud analysis requires rigid alignment without allowing genuine geometric change to bias the estimated pose. This study presents a reliability-guided iterative closest point (ICP) formulation in which a compact classifier assigns each candidate correspondence to stable, deformation-candidate, or unreliable classes. Stable-class scores softly weight a Cauchy-robust point-to-plane objective on the special Euclidean group SE(3), while deformation candidates are retained for signed-residual mapping. Controlled evaluation comprised 28 factor-level blocks, with 20 independently generated random trials per block and 560 paired trials per method. The three-class method achieved median rotational and translational errors of 0.227 degrees and 4.103 mm and 96.61% registration recall. Its principal benefit was changed-region discrimination: the F1 score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) reached 0.524 for the 5 and 10 mm cases, compared with 0.413 for binary classifier-guided ICP. However, the binary method produced slightly better rigid-registration accuracy, and the three-class stable-region false-positive rate was 6.71%. An external stress test on a Stanford Bunny scan pair used 60 controlled initialisations. Point-to-point ICP achieved 100% success, whereas the unretrained three-class method achieved 0% and assigned 39.3% of rigid-object correspondences to the deformation class. The results support three-way correspondence modelling as a controlled proof of concept but demonstrate that balanced synthetic training does not yield calibration-free transfer. Real-domain calibration, stronger geometric baselines, and validation with independent displacement ground truth are required before deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutlimuratov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: