Clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are frequently developed in academic centres yet deployed in community hospitals with different workflows, staffing, and oversight. In Canada, where community hospitals constitute approximately 90% of hospitals, this creates a validation-to-implementation gap. Health Canada’s 2026 pre-market guidance for machine learning-enabled medical devices addresses manufacturer responsibilities but leaves hospital implementation responsibilities under-specified. This article proposes a framework for community hospital AI implementation readiness organized around four dimensions (contextual validity, sociotechnical workflow integration, calibrated human-AI reliance, and adaptive safety, equity, and governance), operationalized through simulation-based systems testing. The framework specifies what a community hospital must build to deploy a specific AI tool safely, extending an established Canadian tradition of simulation-based systems testing to the lifecycle risks of AI. A real Canadian deployment, the CHARTwatch early warning system, illustrates the dimensions in practice. Safe AI deployment in community hospitals is an institutional capacity, not a procurement decision. Leaders should treat implementation readiness as core infrastructure investment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Changiz Mohiyeddini (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: