We couple two sets of simulated market and credit paths by minimizing absolute temporal-correlation error relative to a prescribed target. Each market path receives exactly one credit path, preserving both empirical distributions of complete scenarios. A perfect-matching test identifies whether a uniform correlation-error tolerance is feasible and determines its smallest attainable value. Further assignments give exact empirical mean-loss and exceedance-probability bounds; quantile bounds follow by binary search over eligible loss thresholds. A synthetic bond-forward credit stress test illustrates the method. The experiments report matching precision, empirical score tails and exposure-grid error, and measure matching and mean-loss computation. The method is independent of the scenario generator and provides a reproducible way to examine dependence assumptions in existing risk engines. Tail measures concern default-probability-weighted credit scores. Accompanying reproducibility package (Python code, synthetic scenario libraries, permutations, and benchmarks) is attached in the ZIP archive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naoufal Nifa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: