Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the SEFT teaching model in improving surgical residents’ clinical practice competencies, so as to provide a basis for optimizing training strategies.Methods This single-center, non-randomized retrospective cohort study included 38 residents. The 2019 cohort (n = 19) was the control group, receiving traditional demonstration and practice-based training, while the 2020 cohort (n = 19) was the intervention group, trained via the SEFT teaching model. Scores across five core competencies were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.Results The intervention group scored significantly higher than the control group across all five assessment domains (all p < 0.05): medical history taking (90.43 ± 3.83 vs. 84.29 ± 10.63, p = 0.039), physical examination (91.20 ± 4.88 vs. 83.76 ± 11.51, p = 0.017), initial medical record documentation (90.61 ± 4.98 vs. 84.20 ± 4.97, p < 0.001), and clinical reasoning and decision-making (87.00 ± 3.64 vs. 80.76 ± 9.24, p = 0.039).Discussion The SEFT teaching model, with its closed-loop structure and targeted feedback, showed promising potential to enhance surgical residents’ clinical practice competencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: