Purpose This study examines how teaching practices, student experience, family support and institutional conditions align to sustain future-oriented integral learning in primary education. Design/methodology/approach A convergent mixed-methods secondary analysis was conducted using an anonymised dataset from three Colombian primary schools. The quantitative strand calculated instrument-specific descriptive summaries, while the qualitative strand synthesised pre-assigned multilabel themes from de-identified records. A school-by-dimension joint display distinguished cross-method convergence from cross-stakeholder and within-stakeholder/self-report consistency, while also retaining complementarity, divergence, single-source findings, absence of evidence and source asymmetries. Findings Across the three cases, the same EESSAX-18 form yielded generally favourable student self-reports; teacher and family records were also favourable within their respective instruments. Mixed-source integration nevertheless identified contextual constraints in resources, ICT, monitoring and school-family communication. Because leadership evidence comprised only six records from non-equivalent instruments, evidence on institutional implementation conditions was treated as a limited contextual signal and interpreted alongside teacher, qualitative and documentary sources rather than as a cross-school estimate. The integrated pattern indicated that favourable pedagogical intention could coexist with constraints in enabling ecosystem conditions. Originality/value The study contributes a preliminary, traceability-oriented analytical framework for integrating heterogeneous multi-stakeholder evidence while preserving source-specific limits and asymmetries. Practically, the framework can help schools identify misalignments among teaching practice, student experience, family support, institutional implementation conditions and socio-emotional and values-based learning before selecting improvement actions. It contributes situated evidence from Latin American primary education on how schools may move from valuable practices to sustainable integral learning innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buitrago-Díaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: