Objectives Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine and metabolic disorder affecting reproductive-aged women. While individual micronutrients have been investigated, the integrated multi-vitamin landscape and its relationship with hyperandrogenism remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to characterize serum vitamin profiles via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and explore their associations with androgen levels across a three-arm cohort. Methods Nine vitamins and three androgens were quantified via LC-MS/MS in 184 women: healthy controls (HC, n = 61), women with PCOS ( n = 66), and non-PCOS infertile women (NPI, n = 57). Between-group differences were adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI). The vitamin A–DHEAS association was formally tested using interaction regression and Fisher’s r -to- z tests. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using nested logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation. Results After adjustment, PCOS was associated with elevated vitamin A and lower vitamin E, B 1 , and 25(OH)D 2 relative to HC (all p < 0.001, FDR q < 0.05). Vitamin A correlated positively with DHEAS specifically in PCOS ( r = 0.394, p = 0.001), but not in HC ( r = − 0.007) or NPI ( r = 0.021); interaction regression ( β = 2.600, p = 0.005) and Fisher’s r -to- z tests ( p = 0.020 − 0.033) confirmed this group difference. Adding vitamin A to a testosterone-based model improved the AUC from 0.823 to 0.877 for distinguishing PCOS from non-PCOS (DeLong p = 0.035). Conclusions This LC-MS/MS study reveals distinct serum vitamin profiles in women with PCOS, including a statistically supported PCOS-specific vitamin A–DHEAS association. These findings indicate that altered vitamin status is part of the endocrine-metabolic phenotype of PCOS, and that vitamin A adds incremental diagnostic information beyond conventional androgens. However, the diagnostic models remain exploratory and require external validation in independent cohorts before clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: