Effective water management is imperative for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. This study presents an investigation of water management in dead-end anode (DEA) proton exchange membrane fuel cells by correlating current density with anode and cathode liquid saturation, and membrane water content under well-controlled purge intervals of 0.5, 0.75, and 1 s. By explicitly linking purge strategy to the evolution of water accumulation and performance transitions, the work provides innovative physical insight into the fundamental trade-off between enhanced membrane hydration and mass-transport limitations. Results show that DEA operation enhances membrane hydration, where 0.5 s purge attains the maximum value of water content with15.8 at 1.5 A/cm 2 , followed by 14.8 at 1.4 A/cm 2 for the 0.75 s purge, and 1 s purge achieves 13.7 at 1.2 A/cm 2 , whereas parallel flow reaches 12.0 at 1.0 A/cm 2 . The DEA increases anode liquid saturation to 0.78 at 1.5 A/cm 2 (0.5 s), 0.74 at 1.4 A/cm 2 (0.75 s), and 0.69 at 1.2 A/cm 2 (1 s), compared with 0.52 at 1.0 A/cm 2 for parallel flow, representing increases of 51%, 42%, and 33%, respectively. The DEA configuration improves voltage performance compared with parallel flow, with average enhancements of 50.7%, 73.0%, and 78.2% for purge durations of 0.5, 0.75, and 1 s, respectively. Compared with parallel flow, purge durations enhance power density by 24% (0.5 s), 36% (0.75 s), and 56% (1 s), reaching 0.62, 0.68, and 0.78 W/cm 2 at 1.0, 1.1, and 1.3 A/cm 2 , respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aljabr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: