Early-exit networks can reduce conditional inference work by replacing a subset of full-depth predictions with shallow classifier outputs. This exploratory preprint examines a calibration-only, class-conditional correction based on estimated regret when shallow and final predictions disagree. Using a two-exit PyTorch multilayer perceptron and 12 stratified splits of the 1,797-example scikit-learn handwritten-digits benchmark, we evaluate clean and synthetic-corruption scenarios under three levels of class imbalance, with confidence and margin early-exit baselines. On clean balanced data at a 60% calibration exit target, the examined route attains 96.55% mean classification accuracy and reduces estimated dense-layer multiply-accumulates by 43.72% relative to full-depth execution of the same two-head network, or 41.68% relative to a final-head-only backbone. Standard confidence routing achieves comparable results. One synthetic noise/imbalance setting shows a modest condition-specific advantage, but the explored correction does not consistently improve accuracy or class-level performance. We report all results and runnable source, including the limitations of a small dataset and operation-count rather than wall-clock evaluation. This is a non-peer-reviewed exploratory research note, not a claim of state-of-the-art performance. Generative AI assisted with research prototyping, implementation, analysis, and manuscript drafting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moses Oumo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: