This conceptual working paper develops an AI prompt for conflict analysis grounded in Jean-Pol Martin’s NewHuman Rights (NMR). Its central requirement is to identify aggressors and victims explicitly when supported byevidence and to derive concrete responsibilities for protecting those subjected to aggression. Equal human rightsdo not imply moral equivalence between aggression and defence.Life preservation and six equal-ranking basic needs—thinking, health, security, social inclusion, self-realisation andparticipation, and meaning—provide the normative framework. Prevention, reliability and sustainability guide theassessment of protective measures. The prompt connects factual analysis, differentiated responsibility andeffective, proportionate and lawful action, including consideration of the consequences of omission.The article explains its specific contribution and its function within the series on Lernen durch Lehren (LdL), NMRand human–AI cooperation. A human–AI dialogue illustrates the development problem; it is not presented asempirical validation. The complete English prompt is included in an appendix, together with a proposedcomparative evaluation design. AI assistance in drafting, translation and document production is disclosed;responsibility rests with the human author.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jean-Pol Martin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: