Machine-learning classifiers trained on laboratory reflectance spectra of meteorites are increasingly used to interpret asteroid observations, but they are routinely deployed outside the conditions under which they were validated: telescope targets differ from laboratory powders in grain size, viewing geometry, space weathering, class abundances, and sensor range. We introduce distribution-shift-aware conformal prediction to planetary reflectance spectroscopy, converting any spectral classifier into a set-valued predictor with finite-sample coverage guarantees, and we measure exactly how those guarantees behave when the deployment assumptions fail. From 16,291 RELAB Planetary Data System products, we curate 2,949 meteorite spectra into a leakage-controlled, provenance-tracked data set spanning 9 classes and 756 physical specimens. Same-specimen controlled experiments show that empirical coverage degrades with physical shift severity: grain-size mismatch removes up to 22 points of coverage, pulsed-laser space weathering removes 15 points on identical rocks, viewing geometry up to 40–60° phase leaves coverage intact, and a linear domain-classifier AUC tracks severity while proving necessary but not sufficient for failure. Class-conditional calibration is invariant to arbitrary class-prior changes and rescues the scientifically critical CI class, which marginal calibration silently abandons. Likelihood-ratio-weighted conformal prediction restores nominal coverage under a pure covariate shift but misfires when the shift carries a label component, yielding a practical combined prescription. Transferred to 694 MITHNEOS near-Earth-asteroid spectra, the calibrated sets remain informative and recover the Itokawa and Vesta-family ground truths, whereas returned-sample tests on Ryugu and Bennu expose exactly where representation, not calibration, becomes the binding constraint.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali A. Khairbek (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: